The Big Question Missing from the Google Diversity Debate

Dr. Nika White • August 12, 2017

You would probably need a Google Alert  to try and keep up with this story, but here’s a quick summary:  Google engineer James Damore recently distributed a 10-page internal memo  against Google’s gender diversity policies. In it, he lays out several arguments for why Google – and the tech industry in general – should not try to “force” gender equality, or reshape itself so that there’s a 50-50 balance. He says it’s just not biologically logical.

This week, Mr. Damore was fired.Mr. Damore apparently wrote the document  in response to Google’s efforts to address the gender gap in its company, seeing it as evidence of a culture hostile to dissenting viewpoints. Google swiftly dismissed him on the grounds that “portions of the memo violate our code of conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace.” What D&I leaders should be asking is not only where that line is, but whether this expectation was clearly communicated. Were there more employees who shared some of Mr. Damore’s sentiments leading to the bold position he decided to spell out and disseminate?  Were warning signs dismissed or ignored prior to the proportions reached by Mr. Damore?

We need to take a big step back to the point before he first thought to sit down at a computer to write his manifesto. The big question is, what about Google’s company culture made him feel that it would be okay – or necessary? The warning signs must have been there. I have to wonder what about Google’s culture allowed a senior software engineer – a leader on some level – to feel it would be okay to write and distribute to employees a 10-page manifesto speaking against the values of inclusion when Google supposedly views inclusion as an asset. To me, this is what we need to dig into. To write personal reflections is one thing, but to have the confidence to distribute it to company employees is arrogant. People who tend to make “boss” moves like that have no situational awareness, feel justified, or simply don’t care about the consequences. We need only to look at some of the points in his argument to know that he was not writing from a framework that includes a mature and full understanding of diversity. It’s possible that Google did, in fact, present good information and opportunities for discussion that Mr. Damore simply rejected or failed to grasp. But taking his argument and document at face value, several myths he perpetrates are striking, including these two:

  1. He thinks D&I is matter of The Right versus The Left, conservative versus liberal. That is the kind of message Google might have inadvertently delivered even before it decided to formally tackle diversity issues. Even though political ideology might never have appeared in any of the formal training materials or discussions, was there something about Google’s culture that would let politics override the true intent? And was that tendency openly addressed and remedied?
  2. Addressing inequities for specific groups is “restricting” and “discriminatory.” Here, it was Google’s responsibility to make sure that employees understood that different groups have different experiences, and that there is sometimes a need to address those within peer groups of shared experience. Equity and equality are NOT the same. While equity and equality are two strategies designed to produce fairness, equity is giving everyone what they need to be successful, while equality is treating everyone the same . Equality aims to promote fairness, but it can only work if everyone starts from the same place and needs the same help.

The story has already spun in many different directions and likely won’t disappear soon. Immediately after Mr. Damore was fired, people were concerned that other employees would no longer feel free to express themselves. I personally don’t buy that: it sounds more like an excuse to tolerate the most offensive and critical parts his argument, namely that women are generally biologically unfit for the work. Engaging in respectful questioning and sharing different opinions and perspectives is not what’s at risk, but a culture of equity, acceptance, inclusion and equality is at risk.

There is one thing Mr. Damore got right. He writes, “Philosophically, I don’t think we should do arbitrary social engineering of tech just to make it appealing to equal portions of both men and women. For each of these changes, we need principle reasons for why it helps Google; that is, we should be optimizing for Google—with Google’s diversity being a component of that.” The business case was missing for Mr. Damore; it is the organization’s responsibility to ensure that the business case for diversity is clear. Communicating the business case and communicating it often is key.

It’s our responsibility as leaders to take big, bold steps when it comes to fostering diversity and inclusion in the workplace. However, those steps must occur on solid ground. There should be a clear understanding of what is happening, and why, and there must be appropriate outlets for the inevitable pushback.

If you’re thinking about requesting or implementing diversity programming in your organization, don’t let the Google controversy have a chilling effect. In fact, let it stoke your fire to be smart about your messaging, and frank about your organization, and brutally honest about the needs. Inclusion is about making diversity of thought, and people with ideas like Mr. Damore’s need to know that they will be heard – even if not necessarily agreed with.

Read more from The Human Shift on Substack, where I share long-form essays on leadership, culture, and how we work and live.

Share this Content:

By Nika White • November 2, 2026
Leaders ask for feedback all the time. They send surveys, invite ideas, and schedule listening sessions. Then people wait. Sometimes they hear nothing about what happened to their input. Eventually, participation begins to feel like a formality. People may still show up, but they stop expecting their perspective to matter. In The Human Shift, we’ve talked about permission and trust. Asking for input gives people permission to speak. What happens afterward teaches them whether speaking was worthwhile. A Reframe Listening includes telling people what you did with what you heard. One Simple Practice Choose one recent request for feedback. Share a short update: what you heard, what will change, what won’t, and why. What This Looks Like In Practice An organization gathers employee ideas about workload. Leadership cannot adopt every suggestion, but it explains which two changes it will test and why other requests need more time. Employees have a clearer picture of how their voices informed the decision. Question to Consider When did you last close the loop with people who offered you their perspective? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What makes you feel that your input was genuinely considered?
By Nika White • October 26, 2026
You leave a meeting thinking the team is aligned. Then the real conversation starts in the hallway, on a private call, or in a message thread. People ask what a decision really means. Someone raises a concern they never mentioned in the room. Another person says what they wished they had said. Side conversations aren’t always evidence of dysfunction. People need time to process. But when the most honest discussion consistently happens elsewhere, the meeting may be missing something important. We’ve explored silence as a cultural signal in The Human Shift. Pay attention to where candor goes when it doesn’t feel possible in the formal room. A Reframe A meeting can end with agreement and still leave people uncertain or unheard. One Simple Practice Before closing your next meeting, ask: "What concern have we not given enough space to?’" Then wait long enough for a real answer. What This Looks Like In Practice A leadership team approves a new process with little discussion. Later, several managers privately question whether their teams can implement it. At the next meeting, the chair asks for practical objections before asking for agreement. The plan improves before rollout. Question to Consider Where do the most candid conversations in your organization actually happen? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. Have you ever learned more in the conversation after a meeting than in the meeting itself?
By Nika White • October 19, 2026
A team member asks whether you’re happy with their work. You answer yes. A few days later, they ask again. It’s tempting to assume they need more confidence. But maybe they’re trying to understand where they stand with you. When expectations change without explanation, or praise is followed by unexpected criticism, people start looking for clues. Even a straightforward question can carry a second question: Am I safe to trust what you’re telling me? We’ve talked in The Human Shift about what people learn from our reactions. They learn from our consistency, too. A reassuring answer matters. A predictable experience makes that answer believable. A Reframe Reassurance helps in the moment. Consistency helps people stop needing to ask. One Simple Practice When someone seeks reassurance, answer their question. Then ask, ‘Is there anything about my expectations that feels unclear?’ Listen without making them defend the question. What This Looks Like In Practice A director notices that a capable colleague keeps checking whether a presentation is ready. Instead of saying ‘You’re fine’ again, she explains what good looks like, what decisions the colleague owns, and when feedback will come. The repeated checking begins to ease. Question to Consider Where might someone need clearer expectations rather than another encouraging word? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What helps you feel confident that you know where you stand with a leader?
By Nika White • October 12, 2026
Organizations spend a lot of time talking about culture. Mission statements. Values. Leadership competencies. Strategic plans. All of those have a place. But culture doesn't change because new language appears on a website or because a new initiative is announced. Culture begins changing much earlier than that. It changes when people experience something different. A meeting where they feel heard. A leader who responds with curiosity instead of defensiveness. A difficult conversation that ends with greater trust instead of greater distance. A mistake that becomes an opportunity to learn instead of something to hide. Earlier in The Human Shift, we've explored trust, presence, silence, repair, pace, and leadership aftermath. They may seem like separate ideas, but they all point to the same truth. Before culture shifts, emotional climate shifts. People begin feeling safer. More connected. More willing to contribute. More willing to tell the truth. Culture follows those experiences. A Reframe Culture isn't built one initiative at a time. It's built one interaction at a time. One Simple Practice At the end of this week, don't ask yourself, "What did I accomplish?" Ask, "What kind of environment did I help create for the people around me?" Notice what comes to mind. What This Looks Like In Practice A leadership team spends months discussing ways to improve collaboration. Instead of launching another initiative, they begin with a commitment. Every leader will become more intentional about listening, repairing conversations, slowing unnecessary urgency, and making it safer for people to speak honestly. Six months later, employees describe the culture differently. Not because the organization changed overnight. Because the experience of working there changed first. Question to Consider If culture is built through everyday interactions, what kind of culture are your interactions creating today? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What's one small leadership habit you believe has the biggest impact on culture?
By Nika White • October 5, 2026
Think about a leader who had a lasting impact on you. You probably remember a few things they said. You almost certainly remember how it felt to work with them. Maybe you felt trusted. Maybe you felt anxious every time they called. Maybe you felt challenged in a way that helped you grow. Maybe you felt like you were constantly trying to avoid disappointing them. That emotional memory stays with us much longer than most organizational moments. Earlier in The Human Shift, we explored the leadership aftermath and the emotional tone leaders leave behind. Over time, those individual experiences become something much larger. They become the stories people tell about what it was like to work there. That's one of the ways culture is built. Not through one memorable event. Through repeated emotional experiences. A Reframe People don't remember every interaction. They remember the pattern those interactions created. One Simple Practice Think about someone you lead. Complete this sentence: "When this person thinks about working with me, I hope they remember feeling..." Don't overthink it. Write the first word that comes to mind. Then ask yourself whether your daily interactions support that hope. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader asks several team members what they appreciate most about working together. None of them mention strategy. None of them mention goals. Every response describes an experience. "I know you'll listen." "I always leave our conversations feeling clearer." "I know where I stand." The leader realizes those experiences have become part of the team's culture. Question to Consider If someone reflected on working with you five years from now, what feeling would you hope they remember most? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. When you think about the best leader you've ever worked with, what feeling comes to mind first?
By Nika White • September 28, 2026
Leaders often influence pace without realizing it. The speed of your responses. The urgency in your voice. How quickly you move from one meeting to the next. How often you say, "We need this right away." People notice. Then they adjust. Earlier in The Human Shift, we explored the tension between speed and clarity . Pace is different from productivity. Pace is the emotional rhythm people begin to adopt simply by working around you. If everything feels urgent to you, it eventually feels urgent to everyone else. A Reframe People don't just respond to your priorities. They respond to your pace. One Simple Practice Before beginning your next meeting, ask yourself, "What pace does this conversation actually need?" Not every discussion deserves urgency. Some deserve room to think. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader starts opening meetings with sixty seconds of quiet before diving into discussion. At first it feels unusual. Within a few weeks, people arrive more focused, interrupt each other less, and make decisions with greater confidence. The work isn't slower. It's steadier. Question to Consider If someone matched your pace every day, what would their work experience feel like? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What pace are you setting that others may be quietly adopting?
By Nika White • September 21, 2026
Every leader gets it wrong sometimes. A conversation comes across differently than intended. A decision has unintended consequences. Someone leaves feeling overlooked. The mistake itself isn't usually what determines trust. What happens next often does. Earlier in The Human Shift, we explored leadership aftermath and the emotional tone people carry after interactions. Repair is one of the most powerful ways to change that aftermath. It communicates something every healthy culture needs to hear. "We can acknowledge what happened without pretending it didn't." A Reframe Trust isn't built because mistakes never happen. It's built because people know they won't be ignored when they do. One Simple Practice Think about one recent interaction that doesn't sit quite right. Reach back out. A simple, "I've been thinking about our conversation, and I'd like to check in," can reopen trust. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader realizes she interrupted a team member several times during a meeting. The next morning she stops by his office. "I don't think I gave your perspective enough space yesterday. I'd like to hear the rest of your thoughts." The conversation lasts ten minutes. The impact lasts much longer. Question to Consider What conversation might be waiting for a repair instead of an explanation? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. Has someone ever repaired a conversation with you in a way you'll never forget?
By Nika White • September 8, 2026
Many leaders feel pressure to have answers. It's understandable. People look to leaders for direction, especially when things feel uncertain. But some of the most influential leaders I've worked with ask better questions instead of giving faster answers. Questions create space. Answers often close it. Earlier in The Human Shift, we explored how people respond to a leader's presence before they respond to their words . Curiosity creates a different kind of presence. It tells people their perspective matters before a solution is ever offered. A Reframe The goal isn't to have the smartest answer. The goal is to create the kind of conversation where better thinking becomes possible. One Simple Practice The next time someone brings you a challenge, resist solving it immediately. Instead ask, "What do you think is most important for us to understand before we decide what to do?" Then listen. What This Looks Like In Practice A manager walks into a meeting ready to solve a recurring team issue. Instead of offering her recommendation first, she invites the team to share what they're noticing. The conversation uncovers a pattern no one had previously connected. The solution becomes stronger because more people helped build it. Question to Consider Do people leave conversations with you feeling like they contributed or simply received direction? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. When was the last time a thoughtful question changed your perspective?
By Nika White • August 31, 2026
Leaders often wonder why their teams aren't doing more of something. Speaking up. Collaborating. Taking initiative. Thinking creatively. The answer is sometimes found in the everyday moments that seem unrelated. People pay attention to what leaders actually do. If a leader says they value reflection but never slows down, people learn that speed matters more. If a leader encourages honest feedback but becomes defensive when receiving it, people learn that honesty has limits. If a leader talks about work-life balance but sends emails late into the evening, people learn what the real expectation is. Earlier in The Human Shift, we explored unspoken expectations . Most cultures are shaped less by formal messages than by repeated observations. A Reframe Whether you realize it or not, you're always giving people permission. The question is what you're giving them permission to do. One Simple Practice Complete this sentence: "My team probably believes it's okay to..." Write down the first answer that comes to mind. Then ask yourself whether your behavior has been teaching that lesson intentionally. What This Looks Like In Practice A leader tells her team they don't need to respond after hours. Then she notices she's emailing at 10:30 every night. She schedules those messages to send the next morning instead. Nothing about the policy changes. Everything about the signal does. Question to Consider If people copied your leadership habits exactly, what kind of culture would they create? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What's one behavior of yours that may be communicating more loudly than your words?
By Nika White • August 24, 2026
People pay attention to what leaders celebrate. They pay even closer attention to what leaders react to. A frustrated sigh. A quick interruption. An impatient email. A defensive response to feedback. None of these moments seem particularly significant on their own. But people are always learning from them. They begin to understand which questions are welcome. Which mistakes feel risky. Which conversations require extra caution. Earlier in The Human Shift, we explored how silence often becomes a cultural signal. Silence rarely appears without first being taught what feels safe to say. Your reactions become part of that lesson. A Reframe People don't simply hear your expectations. They study your reactions. One Simple Practice The next time someone brings you unexpected news, resist the urge to respond immediately. Take one slow breath. Become curious before becoming corrective. That small pause often changes the entire conversation. What This Looks Like In Practice A team member admits she made an error that will delay a project. Instead of immediately asking how it happened, the leader asks, "Tell me what you've learned so far." The conversation shifts from self-protection to problem-solving. The mistake still gets addressed. The person doesn't leave feeling like the mistake defines them. Question to Consider What have your reactions been teaching people lately? In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. If someone made a mistake today, would they feel comfortable bringing it to you quickly?