Why “Quiet Hiring” May Set Back Your DEI Efforts
Nika White • February 20, 2023
Since before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic,
the trend of quiet quitting had begun to circulate in the news and social media outlets. The phenomenon of quiet quitting is defined as employees who will no longer go above and beyond at work and will instead do exactly what’s being asked of them and nothing more.
I’ve talked about how diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) can help end quiet quitting but still, quiet quitting caused an uproar in the business world as some organizations saw it as a decline in “hardworking values.” In my view, quiet quitting was less about employees not working hard enough and more about workers turning their focus toward work-life balance (or work-life blend as I call it).
Quiet quitting was the predecessor to the Great Resignation of 2020 and 2021. This time, the workers didn’t just coast at their jobs–they acted on their personal and professional ambitions and resigned in droves. This led to an empowering period for workers all over the country who were finally ready to have a healthy work-life blend, ask for increased compensation, and enjoy more flexibility.
What is quiet hiring?
According to CNBC, quiet hiring is when a business hires temporary workers (or contractors) to fill permanent positions or asks existing employees to fill in-demand roles and acquire new responsibilities without increasing their compensation.
Quiet hiring may cause contract labors to miss DEI training
Quiet hiring may widen pay and benefits gaps
Quiet hiring may increase burnout among workers
Quiet hiring may give international candidates more opportunities
One upside to quiet hiring is that international candidates may be given more opportunities for professional advancement than ever before. In industries like healthcare, where a labor shortage has been prevalent since the pandemic began, skilled workers from overseas are now filling roles that have long been in demand but remain vacant. In this sense, quiet hiring may advantage international candidates and open up more opportunities for skilled immigrants from abroad to find new economic opportunities in the U.S. and to do so legally at a time when they’re most needed.
Final thoughts
As organizations continue to hire at rapid rates to fill full-time vacancies, keeping DEI at the forefront of hiring and onboarding decisions can help your company stay on track with its initiatives while still adapting to this economic period. Don’t lose sight of your DEI goals as your organization transitions into this new phase of employee-employer relations.
I’ve talked about how diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) can help end quiet quitting but still, quiet quitting caused an uproar in the business world as some organizations saw it as a decline in “hardworking values.” In my view, quiet quitting was less about employees not working hard enough and more about workers turning their focus toward work-life balance (or work-life blend as I call it).
Quiet quitting was the predecessor to the Great Resignation of 2020 and 2021. This time, the workers didn’t just coast at their jobs–they acted on their personal and professional ambitions and resigned in droves. This led to an empowering period for workers all over the country who were finally ready to have a healthy work-life blend, ask for increased compensation, and enjoy more flexibility.
Fast forward to today: 2023 is bringing a new workplace phenomenon, but this time businesses are the ones calling the shots with “quiet hiring.” This article will explore what quiet hiring is and how it can hinder or derail your business’ DEI initiatives.
According to CNBC, quiet hiring is when a business hires temporary workers (or contractors) to fill permanent positions or asks existing employees to fill in-demand roles and acquire new responsibilities without increasing their compensation.
Essentially, quiet hiring is how companies are dealing with major labor shortages without increasing wages or benefits for workers. So, how does this new phenomenon affect DEI and why should businesses be cautious about the consequences of quiet hiring?
Most companies who have DEI training on workplace bias, cultural sensitivity, and building a culture of belonging offer that training to full-time employees–not temporary workers. As more and more businesses use contractors, freelancers, and non-employee labor, those workers are often left out of mandatory DEI training. This can cause businesses with good intentions for DEI to lose track of their progress and implementation across all departments. When one full-time employee is tasked to do bias training and a newly hired contractor is not, it creates inconsistency for DEI in the workplace. With contract laborers taking up more and more roles within organizations, the lasting results of missed or skipped DEI training for temporary workers may cause a gap in progress that is yet to be seen.
Some businesses are choosing to quiet hire because of rising demand for employee wages and a recession looming on the horizon. Hiring temporary workers or asking existing employees to take on new roles without additional compensation will inevitably lead to a widening pay gap between contractors and employees as well as between employees in stable roles versus newly reassigned roles. A recent study showed a huge pay gap between temporary workers and full-time employees–not just in the United States but around the world.
With women, minorities, and immigrants already experiencing large pay gaps in the general U.S. economy, hiring those same workers temporarily or asking existing workers to work harder without increased compensation makes the DEI goal to close the wage gap and slow pay inequality that much further out of reach. In fact, asking employees to do more work for the same pay could even be considered “wage theft”.
Plus, 1099 contractors and temporary workers likely won’t receive the full benefits packages usually afforded to full-time employees like paid time off, parental leave, or equity stakes. Thus, creating an even larger disadvantage for temporary workers who are performing full-time work without full-time benefits.
With potentially no paid time off for temporary workers and no increase in compensation for existing employees, the opportunity for burnout grows. Burnout is exacerbated when workers are unable to find a work-life blend or get the downtime needed to recover from the heavy demands of work. When employers strip that away from workers or don’t compensate them for their additional responsibilities, burnout is the inevitable result.
In DEI, we advocate for businesses to promote greater work-life blend opportunities to lower or mitigate the effects of burnout. I often advise companies to be generous with benefits like paid time off, parental leave, and bereavement. I also advise employers to have greater respect for the boundaries employees set around their private time. Whether a worker is temporary or full-time, having the space to rest, relax, and return to work feeling rejuvenated should not be rare or the exception. It should be the standard.
One upside to quiet hiring is that international candidates may be given more opportunities for professional advancement than ever before. In industries like healthcare, where a labor shortage has been prevalent since the pandemic began, skilled workers from overseas are now filling roles that have long been in demand but remain vacant. In this sense, quiet hiring may advantage international candidates and open up more opportunities for skilled immigrants from abroad to find new economic opportunities in the U.S. and to do so legally at a time when they’re most needed.
Final thoughts
Quiet hiring shouldn’t derail your DEI initiatives when policies and practices are applied evenly amongst temporary and full-time workers. If your company is choosing to hire temporary workers in this current economic climate, be mindful of what opportunities temporary workers are being afforded or deprived of. Are they being included in DEI training like their full-time counterparts? How can your business include temporary workers in the typical employee training and protocols to ensure they don’t get left behind economically, psychologically, or professionally?
For current employees who are being asked to do more, how can your organization compensate them fairly for their increased responsibilities or provide other benefits like additional paid time off or longer parental leave? What else can you do to show existing employees that your organization cares about their well-being and that you want them to experience increased workplace satisfaction?
Read more from The Human Shift on Substack, where I share long-form essays on leadership, culture, and how we work and live.
Share this Content:
Some leaders become known as “the calm one.” The one who steadies the room. Who doesn’t react. Who absorbs tension without showing it. It’s a valuable presence. But over time, it can quietly become a role you feel responsible to maintain. Not because it’s always needed. But because it’s expected. Earlier in The Human Shift, The Shift from Bracing to Grounding , we explored how leaders often move into bracing without realizing it. Being “the calm one” can sometimes be a more refined version of the same pattern—holding steady externally while managing pressure internally. A Reframe Calm is not a performance. It is a state that requires support. One Simple Practice Notice one moment today where you feel responsible for stabilizing others. Instead of immediately holding that role, pause and ask: “Is steadiness needed here—or am I used to providing it?” Question to Consider Where has your composure become something you feel you must maintain rather than something you can access? What This Looks Like In Practice Many leaders I work with don’t struggle with composure—they struggle with the cost of sustaining it alone. When shared steadiness becomes possible, leadership begins to feel lighter. In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. Where in your leadership do you feel most responsible for “holding the room”?
Some leaders repeat directions often. Others rarely need to. The difference is not position. It is trust in their steadiness. Authority rooted in pressure requires monitoring. Authority rooted in presence requires less reinforcement. This connects back to grounding, in The Human Shift, The Body Knows Before the Mind Does. When leaders are regulated, direction travels clearly without amplification. Reframe Authority is not measured by force. It is measured by reliability. One Grounded Practice Before giving direction, slow your speaking pace by 10%. Then deliver the message once, clearly and calmly. Consistency communicates confidence more than volume does. Closing Reflection Do people follow your direction because they understand — or because they feel urgency? Contextual Depth Signal Leaders who cultivate a steady presence often find they need fewer reminders, corrections, and escalations. Regulation reduces management load. In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. When you give direction, what do you think your team experiences — clarity or pressure?
Leaders often focus on how meetings go. But the greater influence is what happens afterward. What people replay during their commute. What they describe at dinner. What they anticipate the next morning. Leadership is remembered less for exact wording and more for internal experience. Earlier, in The Human Shift, Culture Is What People Carry Home, we discussed how the emotional residue of leadership interactions shapes engagement more than policies do. Reframe Leadership influence continues after the conversation ends. One Grounded Practice After a meeting, pause for one minute and ask: “If I were in that conversation as a participant, how would I feel right now?” Not how you intended. How it likely landed. Closing Reflection What emotional tone do your interactions leave behind? Contextual Depth Signal Organizations often attempt culture change through communication strategies, but emotional experience — not mes saging — is what employees actually carry. In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. After a typical meeting with you, what do you think people feel most — clarity, pressure, or steadiness?
Leaders often believe transparency exists because information is available. But culture is revealed by what people choose to share — not what they’re allowed to share. When teams withhold concerns, it rarely begins with fear. It begins with small experiences: Ideas redirected quickly Mistakes met with visible tension Questions answered defensively Over time, people learn which conversations require self-protection. Earlier, in The Human Shift, Culture Is What People Carry Home, we explored culture as what people absorb. Silence is one of the clearest indicators of that absorption. Reframe Candor depends less on policies and more on predictability of response. One Grounded Practice In your next meeting, when someone raises a concern, respond first with: “Tell me more.” Do not correct immediately. Do not solve immediately. Signal curiosity before direction. Closing Reflection What information seems to reach you last? Contextual Depth Signal Many culture initiatives fail not because values are unclear, but because reactions teach people which truths are welcome. In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. If someone on your team hesitates before speaking, what do you think they’re predicting?
Not all fast decisions are strategic. Some are relief. Ambiguity produces tension. A quick decision restores certainty — even if it doesn’t improve outcomes. Leaders often experience resolution as progress. But clarity and certainty are not the same. Earlier in The Human Shift, The Stories We Tell Under Pressure , grounding was described as remaining present under pressure. Many leadership decisions improve when leaders stay with uncertainty slightly longer than feels comfortable. Reframe A quick decision reduces discomfort. A clear decision reduces rework. One Grounded Practice When faced with a non-urgent decision, ask: “What additional information might emerge if I waited 24 hours?” Then actually wait. Not to avoid responsibility. To allow discernment to complete. Closing Reflection Where in your work might patience increase effectiveness? Contextual Depth Signal In advisory settings, leaders often discover that many operational “fires” were created by premature decisions rather than delayed ones. In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. Which decision right now feels pressing — and what would happen if you gave it one more day?
Many leadership expectations are never written in a role description. Holding tension in meetings. Staying steady when others escalate. Containing uncertainty without amplifying it. We often call these “soft skills.” They are not soft. They are regulatory labor. When leaders manage emotional intensity, they stabilize the environment for others. Yet because this effort is invisible, leaders often interpret their fatigue as inadequacy rather than expenditure. Earlier, in The Human Shift, Culture Is What People Carry Home , we discussed that regulation is one of the primary ways leaders influence what others carry. Reframe Composure is not effortless. It is energy being used on behalf of the group. One Grounded Practice At the end of the workday, ask yourself: “Where did I hold the emotional center for others today?” Then intentionally do one small action that returns attention to yourself — a walk, silence, or stepping outside for two minutes. Regulation requires recovery. Closing Reflection Where have you been calling leadership strain a personal weakness instead of a leadership function? Contextual Depth Signal In executive work, many leaders don’t need more resilience training. They need permission to recognize that stabilizing others uses real capacity — and to pace themselves accordingly. In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What part of your leadership today required the most emotional steadiness? Read more from The Human Shift on Substack , where I share long-form essays on leadership, culture, and how we work and live. [NW
Two leaders can say the same words and produce entirely different outcomes. One conversation invites reflection. Another produces compliance. A third produces quiet withdrawal. The difference is rarely the phrasing. It is the state of the person delivering it. Before a listener processes meaning, their body processes safety. If tension, urgency, or frustration is present, the nervous system prioritizes protection over learning. The person may nod, agree, or apologize—but understanding has not actually occurred. Earlier in The Human Shift, The Body Knows Before the Mind Does , we explored how the body registers experience before the mind interprets it. Feedback follows that same sequence. Presence communicates before language does. Reframe Feedback is received through regulation before it is received through reasoning. One Grounded Practice Before offering feedback, take 30 seconds to orient yourself to the environment: Look around the room. Name three neutral objects you can see. Slow your exhale once. Then begin the conversation. Grounded delivery increases learning far more than refined wording. Closing Reflection What state are others experiencing when they receive guidance from you? Contextual Depth Signal In leadership coaching, feedback rarely fails because leaders lack clarity. It fails because the emotional tone of the interaction determines whether the brain processes information or threat. In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. Think about your last feedback conversation — how regulated did you feel before it started?
High-capacity leaders often step in before others struggle. They refine the message. They fix the slide. They solve the problem before it fully forms. The intention is almost always supportive. But the impact accumulates differently. When leaders consistently intervene early, teams stop developing judgment. Initiative declines. And the leader’s workload increases—not because the team lacks ability, but because the team lacks ownership. Control rarely announces itself as control. It appears helpful. Earlier in The Human Shift, Capacity Is Not Infinite , we discussed capacity as information. Control is often a response to leaders sensing the system might falter and unconsciously compensating. The leader becomes the stabilizer. And stabilizers eventually become exhausted. Reframe Support strengthens capability. Preemption weakens it. One Grounded Practice The next time a team member brings you a solvable problem, pause before offering a solution and ask: “What options are you considering?” Then wait. Do not refine immediately. Do not redirect quickly. Allow their thinking to complete before yours begins. Leadership capacity grows when others experience themselves as capable. Closing Reflection Where might your helpfulness be preventing someone else’s development? Contextual Depth Signal In organizational advisory work, many leadership bottlenecks are not skill issues but ownership issues. When leaders shift from solving to supporting thinking, both performance and energy improve. In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. Where do you feel most necessary right now—and is it because of structure or habit?
Many leaders live in a state of readiness they no longer notice. They check messages before standing up in the morning. They anticipate disagreement before a conversation begins. They prepare responses before anyone finishes speaking. At first, this feels like responsibility. Over time, it becomes physiology. The body learns to expect interruption, so it stops settling. Attention shortens. Everything begins to feel slightly time-sensitive—even when it isn’t. This isn’t only about workload. It’s about nervous system posture. Earlier in The Human Shift, The Shift from Bracing to Grounding , we explored bracing—the body preparing to endure pressure. Constant readiness is a quieter version of the same pattern. Leaders aren’t reacting to the present demand. They’re reacting to a predicted one. And prediction changes perception. When leaders remain perpetually ready, they begin interpreting more situations as urgent than they actually are. Conversations compress. Listening becomes strategic instead of receptive. Discernment narrows. Reframe Urgency is not always information. Sometimes it is anticipation that the body hasn’t updated yet. One Grounded Practice Today, before responding to a non-emergency message or request, pause for one full breath cycle. Not to delay action. To confirm necessity. Notice: • Did the situation actually require speed? • Or did your body simply expect it? Grounding begins by distinguishing immediacy from importance. Closing Reflection Where in your leadership are you responding to expectation rather than reality? Contextual Depth Signal In my coaching work, leaders often discover their decision fatigue is less about volume and more about constant readiness. When urgency is recalibrated, clarity returns quickly—without reducing responsibility. In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. What in your work currently feels urgent—and what might simply be asking for your presence?
Inclusion Isn’t Exhausting—Disconnection Is: Why fatigue around inclusion often signals something deeper than disagreement When people say they’re tired of inclusion work, they are rarely describing values. They are describing an experience. Often it sounds like resistance on the surface. But beneath it, something more specific is happening: Disconnection from meaning. From impact. From each other. Sometimes from themselves. Inclusion becomes exhausting when it is treated as an initiative rather than an environment. When language expands but daily experience doesn’t change. When expectations increase faster than people’s capacity to understand or embody them. The effort then feels performative instead of relational. Earlier in The Human Shift, Culture Is What People Carry Home We explored how inclusion fatigue often emerges when people cannot locate inclusion in lived interactions—only in messaging. Without experience, even well-intended work begins to feel like compliance. The fatigue isn’t coming from caring too much. It’s coming from not knowing where caring actually lands. Reframe Fatigue is not a failure of values. It is a signal of misalignment. And misalignment does not ask for abandonment. It asks for reconnection. One Grounded Practice Instead of asking, “How do we do inclusion better?” ask: “Where are people most disconnected right now?” Listen specifically for: moments people feel unseen moments people feel cautious speaking moments effort does not match impact This shifts the conversation from strategy to experience—and experience is where inclusion either exists or does not. Closing Reflection If inclusion were measured by everyday interactions instead of organizational intention, what would you notice first? Contextual Depth Signal In my equity and leadership advisory work, organizations often regain momentum not by adding new initiatives but by reconnecting daily behavior with stated purpose. When inclusion becomes experiential rather than instructional, energy returns quickly. In the shift, Dr. Nika White P.S. Where in your environment right now does inclusion feel most like a requirement—and where does it feel like belonging?
